Editing Coolranch–Swaringen brawl
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
− | The '''Coolranch–Swaringen brawl''' (colloquially known as the '''Zinn's Villains Brawl''' and '''America's Got Talent Quarter-Finals Result''') was an altercation that occurred during the first episode of the eighth season of ''[[Vote for the Girls (U.S.)|Vote for the Girls]]'', and the ___________ episode of the series overall. The episode first aired on August 27, 2016 that centered on the altercation on during the result between the web site's male villains | + | The '''Coolranch–Swaringen brawl''' (colloquially known as the '''Zinn's Villains Brawl''' and '''America's Got Talent Quarter-Finals Result''') was an altercation that occurred during the first episode of the eighth season of ''[[Vote for the Girls (U.S.)|Vote for the Girls]]'', and the ___________ episode of the series overall. The episode first aired on August 27, 2016 that centered on the altercation on during the result between the web site's male villains [[Archibald Coolranch]] and [[Glenn Swaringen]]. <ref>??</ref> |
− | During the [[wikipedia:America's Got Talent (season 11)|''AGT'' 11]] Quarterfinals 2 Result, a fight broke out between villains on the set of Vote for the Girls. After the fight was broken up, [[Bill Delagatto]] threw a drink at Swaringen, sparking a massive brawl between moderators and the audience. | + | During the [[wikipedia:America's Got Talent (season 11)|''AGT'' 11]] Quarterfinals 2 Result, a fight broke out between villains on the set of Vote for the Girls. After the fight was broken up, [[Bill Delagatto]] threw a drink at Swaringen, sparking a massive brawl between moderators and the audience. |
<!---- | <!---- | ||
Weeks after the episode and following the AGT11 Quarterfinals 3 Result, the web site's creator [[Ava Zinn]] suspended two villains moderators for a total of 32 shows, which led to $2 million in salary being lost by the moderators. Three moderators of the web site also charged with assault, and eventually sentenced to a year of probation and community service. Three fans that attended the taping also faced criminal charges and were banned from attending Vote for the Girls tapings for life. The fight also led the Ava Zinn to increase security between moderators and the audience, and to limit the sale of alcohol. | Weeks after the episode and following the AGT11 Quarterfinals 3 Result, the web site's creator [[Ava Zinn]] suspended two villains moderators for a total of 32 shows, which led to $2 million in salary being lost by the moderators. Three moderators of the web site also charged with assault, and eventually sentenced to a year of probation and community service. Three fans that attended the taping also faced criminal charges and were banned from attending Vote for the Girls tapings for life. The fight also led the Ava Zinn to increase security between moderators and the audience, and to limit the sale of alcohol. | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
In the Vote for the Girls dressing room, Rock angrily confronted Zinn over her intervening Everman over Chow. Chow asked Rock whether she thought the moderators would get in trouble. Rock responded, "We'll be very fucking lucky if we have a motherfucking job", and the conversation convinced an amazed Everman and Jameson that Chow "wasn't in her right mind to ask that question." | In the Vote for the Girls dressing room, Rock angrily confronted Zinn over her intervening Everman over Chow. Chow asked Rock whether she thought the moderators would get in trouble. Rock responded, "We'll be very fucking lucky if we have a motherfucking job", and the conversation convinced an amazed Everman and Jameson that Chow "wasn't in her right mind to ask that question." | ||
---------------> | ---------------> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==Charges== | ==Charges== | ||
Line 91: | Line 83: | ||
− | Delagatto was given the longest suspension; he was suspended for the remainder of the the site's eighth season, <!---- a suspension which eventually totaled 30 shows, the longest suspension for an on-set incident in Vote for the Girls USA history ----> | + | Delagatto was given the longest suspension; he was suspended for the remainder of the the site's eighth season, <!---- a suspension which eventually totaled 30 shows, the longest suspension for an on-set incident in Vote for the Girls USA history ---->. Delagatto's suspension will surpass Holly Everman's suspension for an on-set incident. |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<!---- | <!---- | ||
In the week following the announcement of the terminations of Chow and Jameson, an arbitrator appealed the suspensions and/or terminations of Chow, Rock, and Everman, saying they thought that Ava Zinn had "exceeded her authority". (Rock felt that despite losing hundreds of thousands the moderators were fortunate, however, as Zinn could have expelled them from the franchise.) A local arbitrator upheld the full length of all suspensions, except that of Everman, which was reduced to the fall cycle. However, a judge issued an injunction allowing Everman to resume duties, until a full hearing was held. Zinn argued that under the terms of the moderator's agreement Zinn had absolute authority to hand out suspensions and hear appeals for all on-set incidents. But the judge ruled that because Everman's behavior was an off-court incident, arbitration was allowed under the moderator's agreement, and thus the arbitrator was within his rights to reduce the suspension. | In the week following the announcement of the terminations of Chow and Jameson, an arbitrator appealed the suspensions and/or terminations of Chow, Rock, and Everman, saying they thought that Ava Zinn had "exceeded her authority". (Rock felt that despite losing hundreds of thousands the moderators were fortunate, however, as Zinn could have expelled them from the franchise.) A local arbitrator upheld the full length of all suspensions, except that of Everman, which was reduced to the fall cycle. However, a judge issued an injunction allowing Everman to resume duties, until a full hearing was held. Zinn argued that under the terms of the moderator's agreement Zinn had absolute authority to hand out suspensions and hear appeals for all on-set incidents. But the judge ruled that because Everman's behavior was an off-court incident, arbitration was allowed under the moderator's agreement, and thus the arbitrator was within his rights to reduce the suspension. | ||
Line 107: | Line 96: | ||
!Moderator||align=center|Suspension by VFTG||align=center|Fine(s) paid | !Moderator||align=center|Suspension by VFTG||align=center|Fine(s) paid | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |{{sortname|Bill|Delagatto}}||remainder of Vote for the Girls 2017||<!----{{ntsh|1275000}}$1,275,000----> | + | |{{sortname|Bill|Delagatto}}*||remainder of Vote for the Girls 2017||<!----{{ntsh|1275000}}$1,275,000----> |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|-class="unsortable" | |-class="unsortable" |